Alabama State Supreme Court: Roe v. Wade “Patently Illogical” October 19, 2018:
The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that an unborn baby is a “person” under the law, and, consequently, the death of that person can be punished with execution.
Further, in a special concurrence, Justice Tom Parker called on the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that created a “right” to abortion. “I write specially to expound upon the principles presented in the main opinion and to note the continued legal anomaly and logical fallacy that is Roe v. Wade,” he said. “I urge the United States Supreme Court to overrule this increasingly isolated exception to the rights of unborn children.”
>>180004 >The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that an unborn baby is a “person” under the law, and, consequently, the death of that person can be punished with execution. So based. The gallows season will open and the whores will hang.
>>180004 Thots be-fucking-gone. I doubt the blue states will make rulings like this, but at least some of the whores will need to think long and hard about the consequences of wild, frequent sex and hopefully take actual responsibility for the first time in their fucking lives.
>>180113 Hopefully being the key word there, what's more likely is that they'll flee the fucking state either wholesale or to get abortions elsewhere, and if they can't, they at least have to accept the consequences of pregnancy. And later down the line, the judgement of their children.
I've always been basically neutral on the abortion issue itself, but I feel like if we could get Roe v. Wade overturned and allow currently red states to implement more draconian abortion laws, it might serve as a deterrent to people from expensive blue states moving in. The US is really not so much red states vs. blue states anymore so much as it's country districts vs. city districts. The biggest concentration of AIDS is still on the two coasts, but lefties who can't afford to live there keep slowly but steadily migrating to cities in the interior of the country. Major cities even in red states have a tendency to have dense blue districts at their core, and if those blue districts get large enough it could eventually flip a lot of states and turn the electoral map against us. That's basically what happened to New Mexico and Colorado.
A lot of California leftists would probably not be as keen on moving to Texas or Tennessee if those states had strong anti-abortion laws in place, and there would probably also be an exodus of young "professional" class women out of cities in red states as well. Long term we really need to isolate the left as much as possible, try to force them into containment zones and convince them to stay there before they fuck up the rest of the country as bad as they've fucked up NY and Cali.
>>180251 When you put it that way, I'm all for a deterrent for blue migration to red states. Additionally, young professional women who are or would be successful are cognizant of the impact that an unplanned or unwedded child would have on their career or viability, and would have the presence of mind to use contraception. Really, the greatest impact this ruling would have is on poor and/or unresponsible sexuality. If results like this produce a polarization of political ideologies (particularly ones that embed democrats in their precious sanctuary cities) I'm not seeing a downside. I'm sure there is or would be one, but atm I like this.
>>180251 A lot of the blue city votes are coming from niggers. We'd need to crack down on welfare too because Laquishana doesn't abort her kids because each new kid is a bigger paycheck from the government.
>>180261 >>180271 >>180273 >>180352 The best way to deal with the black problem is to just cut off their gibs entirely, or maybe more realistically impose restrictions that make welfare far more difficult for nigs to just sponge off of the way they do. Work requirements are an absolute must, and I think there should also be lifetime limits on how much money you can receive from the government for anything. I also think individuals convicted of drug or gang related crimes should automatically be barred from receiving any sort of government benefits, and make it a zero-tolerance policy; meaning if 16 year old Trayvon gets caught selling dimebags on the corner, tough shit. No more benefits for Trayvon ever, which means his mother doesn't get to live off his food stamps while he brings in money selling drugs (I shit you not this is literally a common arrangement for nigs).
Once that's in place you have local police start coming down hard on petty crime, graffiti and shit like that, make it much easier to get convicted of the sort of crimes that would cause you to lose gibs. It would be chaotic for a while and libshits would kvetch about "human rights" bullshit like there's no tomorrow, but if you could keep the policies in place for a couple of generations the nigger problem would vastly improve. Options for them would basically either be to get a job, die, or go to prison. It would basically be forced natural selection.
Food stamps need to be restricted to basics. Meat, produce, bread, milk, juice, etc. Also baking supplies like flour, sugar, etc. If they want some sweets then they should bake them from scratch like grandma used to.
None of this processed junk food. No potato chips, no purple drank, no candy.
>>180471 >common arrangement for nigs And beaners. The problem with what you suggest is that there are a number of agenda-driven groups who don't want the situation to improve, most namely the (((banks))) who are the actual financial backers of food stamps. An improvement in the nigger situation would diminish the rate of progression of the white genocide which, well how quickly do you think (((they))) will be to start supporting that. >>180474 >>180476 Which would bring in lobbying interests from major processed food corporations which are hugely co-owned interchangeably and funded (invested in) by (((you guessed it))). Whether its for white genocide, or just plain money and power, there's plenty of jews in the periphery who have an enormously vested interest in not allowing it to happen.