[ mlpol / qa / go / 1ntr / vx / sp / üb / a ] [ Overboard ] [ Statistics / Banlist / Search ] [ PonyX ] [ Policy / Store ] [ home ]

/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1540067866409-0.png (57.51 KB, 816x569, 1540049107529.png)

File: 1540067866409-1.jpg (47.29 KB, 512x511, 1540060673953.jpg)

00fe0 No.180004

Alabama State Supreme Court: Roe v. Wade “Patently Illogical”
October 19, 2018:

The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that an unborn baby is a “person” under the law, and, consequently, the death of that person can be punished with execution.

Further, in a special concurrence, Justice Tom Parker called on the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that created a “right” to abortion. “I write specially to expound upon the principles presented in the main opinion and to note the continued legal anomaly and logical fallacy that is Roe v. Wade,” he said. “I urge the United States Supreme Court to overrule this increasingly isolated exception to the rights of unborn children.”

Bama Supreme Court Ruling PDF
http://lc.org/PDFs/Attachments2PRsLAs/2018/101918ParkerPhillips.pdf

2186a No.180010

Good.

1703d No.180014


9b16a No.180016

File: 1540069016576.jpg (6.15 KB, 200x251, 1453081855739.jpg)

More niggers in the South. Based!

c9be3 No.180017

File: 1540069446500.jpeg (42.1 KB, 597x625, 1507856581938.jpeg)

>>180016
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

1148c No.180025

>>180016
Niggers didn't get abortions, anyways. There's too much free gibs from the gub'mint in having an ungodly number of children to consider it.

447de No.180037

File: 1540072745955.png (932.09 KB, 711x919, 958EC39E-F0B8-40DA-B1A0-37….png)

Kek, I think they should put a law if you have an abortion you should get your tubes tied because you're clearly not responsible and don’t deserve the privilege to bear children

9b16a No.180040

File: 1540072995112.png (20.78 KB, 336x341, 1476738115108.png)

Tfw just realized I could have had a second older brother from Gen X.

d1d33 No.180059

File: 1540075786380.jpg (234.21 KB, 1197x1080, 1067.jpg)

>>180004
>The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that an unborn baby is a “person” under the law, and, consequently, the death of that person can be punished with execution.
So based.
The gallows season will open and the whores will hang.

c9be3 No.180062

>>180059
thot genocide when?

d1d33 No.180064

File: 1540076556558.png (175.05 KB, 919x970, 1522237608008.png)

>>180062
Not so fast, most of them are still needed for baby farms.

c9be3 No.180076

File: 1540077735311.png (63.19 KB, 680x680, _benis hmmm.png)

>>180064
elaborate on these farms.

d1d33 No.180080

File: 1540078224979-0.png (124 KB, 2000x2211, 2000px-Lebensborn.svg.png)

File: 1540078224979-1.jpg (399.58 KB, 1038x1488, LeboBuch.jpg)

File: 1540078224979-2.jpeg (365.86 KB, 1200x1717, EsACBoTAB.jpeg)

>>180076
Think Lebensborn, think to improve our race.

d2a49 No.180108

File: 1540084393297.png (852.75 KB, 638x703, 1450932785351.png)

>>180004
Thots be-fucking-gone. I doubt the blue states will make rulings like this, but at least some of the whores will need to think long and hard about the consequences of wild, frequent sex and hopefully take actual responsibility for the first time in their fucking lives.

c9be3 No.180113

File: 1540084600787.jpg (40.2 KB, 600x532, _chad and virgin laughing.jpg)

>>180108
>women taking responsibility

d2a49 No.180115

>>180113
Hopefully being the key word there, what's more likely is that they'll flee the fucking state either wholesale or to get abortions elsewhere, and if they can't, they at least have to accept the consequences of pregnancy. And later down the line, the judgement of their children.

3dd4c No.180119

>>180059
>thot in the center who is bending her knees
Did she just give up at life? She should be able to stand.

1c669 No.180251

File: 1540139836679.jpg (149.97 KB, 690x642, 1528364158214.jpg)

I've always been basically neutral on the abortion issue itself, but I feel like if we could get Roe v. Wade overturned and allow currently red states to implement more draconian abortion laws, it might serve as a deterrent to people from expensive blue states moving in. The US is really not so much red states vs. blue states anymore so much as it's country districts vs. city districts. The biggest concentration of AIDS is still on the two coasts, but lefties who can't afford to live there keep slowly but steadily migrating to cities in the interior of the country. Major cities even in red states have a tendency to have dense blue districts at their core, and if those blue districts get large enough it could eventually flip a lot of states and turn the electoral map against us. That's basically what happened to New Mexico and Colorado.

A lot of California leftists would probably not be as keen on moving to Texas or Tennessee if those states had strong anti-abortion laws in place, and there would probably also be an exodus of young "professional" class women out of cities in red states as well. Long term we really need to isolate the left as much as possible, try to force them into containment zones and convince them to stay there before they fuck up the rest of the country as bad as they've fucked up NY and Cali.

32c57 No.180253

File: 1540140386409.gif (1.69 MB, 360x240, 9c667b5a0dfd5b92e203c4fcb4….gif)

>>180251
When you put it that way, I'm all for a deterrent for blue migration to red states. Additionally, young professional women who are or would be successful are cognizant of the impact that an unplanned or unwedded child would have on their career or viability, and would have the presence of mind to use contraception.
Really, the greatest impact this ruling would have is on poor and/or unresponsible sexuality. If results like this produce a polarization of political ideologies (particularly ones that embed democrats in their precious sanctuary cities) I'm not seeing a downside. I'm sure there is or would be one, but atm I like this.

3dd4c No.180261

>>180251
A lot of the blue city votes are coming from niggers. We'd need to crack down on welfare too because Laquishana doesn't abort her kids because each new kid is a bigger paycheck from the government.

d1d33 No.180271

File: 1540148079946.jpg (116.92 KB, 794x676, NIGGERS.jpg)

>>180261
Yup.
No free money, no reason to pop more coons.
Also wouldn't be a bad idea to promote, or even to enforce, forced sterilizations for those whores unloading children on the State.

c9be3 No.180273

>>180261
>>180271
Food stamps need to be cut in half again.

1148c No.180352

>>180273
And actually make them food stamps again. No more of this "shame free" credit card-style bullshit.

1c669 No.180471

>>180261
>>180271
>>180273
>>180352
The best way to deal with the black problem is to just cut off their gibs entirely, or maybe more realistically impose restrictions that make welfare far more difficult for nigs to just sponge off of the way they do. Work requirements are an absolute must, and I think there should also be lifetime limits on how much money you can receive from the government for anything. I also think individuals convicted of drug or gang related crimes should automatically be barred from receiving any sort of government benefits, and make it a zero-tolerance policy; meaning if 16 year old Trayvon gets caught selling dimebags on the corner, tough shit. No more benefits for Trayvon ever, which means his mother doesn't get to live off his food stamps while he brings in money selling drugs (I shit you not this is literally a common arrangement for nigs).

Once that's in place you have local police start coming down hard on petty crime, graffiti and shit like that, make it much easier to get convicted of the sort of crimes that would cause you to lose gibs. It would be chaotic for a while and libshits would kvetch about "human rights" bullshit like there's no tomorrow, but if you could keep the policies in place for a couple of generations the nigger problem would vastly improve. Options for them would basically either be to get a job, die, or go to prison. It would basically be forced natural selection.

d789f No.180474

Food stamps need to be restricted to basics. Meat, produce, bread, milk, juice, etc. Also baking supplies like flour, sugar, etc. If they want some sweets then they should bake them from scratch like grandma used to.

None of this processed junk food. No potato chips, no purple drank, no candy.

1c669 No.180476

>>180474
I still like the idea of giving them the groceries directly instead of the food stamps. If you're going to live on a subsidy then you'll eat what your subsidizers want to feed you.

32c57 No.180482

>>180471
>common arrangement for nigs
And beaners. The problem with what you suggest is that there are a number of agenda-driven groups who don't want the situation to improve, most namely the (((banks))) who are the actual financial backers of food stamps. An improvement in the nigger situation would diminish the rate of progression of the white genocide which, well how quickly do you think (((they))) will be to start supporting that.
>>180474
>>180476
Which would bring in lobbying interests from major processed food corporations which are hugely co-owned interchangeably and funded (invested in) by (((you guessed it))). Whether its for white genocide, or just plain money and power, there's plenty of jews in the periphery who have an enormously vested interest in not allowing it to happen.

2186a No.180483

>>180476
That would make them less likely to become obese, injure their bodies through obesity, and get more gibs.
That would also make life harder on the Mickey Ds in the ghettoes.

26ae7 No.189773




[ mlpol / qa / go / 1ntr / vx / sp / üb / a ] [ Overboard ] [ Statistics / Banlist / Search ] [ PonyX ] [ Policy / Store ] [ home ]