>Transparency is required of those that govern. Privacy belongs to the people that put them there. >To some, the Deep State is an anonymous, faceless resistance; or as Glenn Greenwald first penned, the entity which “… goes to war with the president-elect, using unverified claims.” To others, it is a vast administrative bureaucracy, unaccountable to anyone; in fact, an “extralegal state within a state.” >Some call it part of a conspiracy theory. And, at least one conspirator recently received priceless support for their agenda through the op-ed pages of The New York Times. >This unelected cabal of federal government employees—the Deep Staters—are getting away with subverting the will of the people. In fact, the Constitution is being stomped upon by the actions of the members of the Deep State. They are in all branches of government and they are hiding among two million other federal employees. >At the most fundamental level, Americans make their voices heard through elections. This is the process to bestow consent for our representatives to govern on our behalf. >The actions of the Deep State fly in the face of the consent part of the governance equation. They seek to subvert the “democratic” process, and through those actions are creating inequality in the application of the Rule of Law. When this is permitted to happen, the will of the people can be thwarted in favor of any agenda that can gain support among the other comrades in the Deep State. That should worry progressives, civil libertarians, and journalists a lot more than it should worry fascists. >We don’t get to see the faces of these shadowy figures, are unable to assess their motives; and the media seems to ignore their real and often obvious objectives. Therefore, it becomes necessary to unmask and show the faces of these individuals who seek to disturb the fabric of our Republic. In order to do that, it becomes necessary to expose them with their own words. >Our next hidden camera investigation is going to unmask the Deep State. https://archive.is/02Wvy
>>174723 Fucking thank you. These faggots are really just retarded. Federal employees are taught, at least I was, you can have your own beliefs but you cant use government time, resources or platforms to further your agenda until out of work. They really just are too retarded to subvert properly. Tfw we are the jews now. I might even go to a few DSA/Communist Party meetings just to see whats up. They're email list mentioned Antifascist stuff.
New PV >BREAKING: Deep State Unmasked, IRS Officials – “You Should Give Increased Scrutiny” to Conservative Groups, “… I don’t give a s**t if that is a crime” >IRS Tax Examiner: Target Conservative Groups Because They Are “… just f***ing fronts for the Koch brothers.” >Deleting IRS Emails is “… so cool… [conservatives] could not hold any evidence against… ” Former IRS Commissioner John Koskinen “…I don’t give a s**t if that is a crime.” >IRS Attorney on Lerner Scandal: “All that stuff we saw in the news, yeah mistakes were made.” >IRS is Comfy Gig, Democratic Socialist of America Gets “… a lot of paid time off and sick days” to Use for Activism >Contempt for America: “Unfortunately, I am not allowed by the bylaws of my union to go against the Constitution.”
Project Veritas returns, beginning a series of videos called Secrets and Lies that focus on elections and the people before and behind the scenes that defy laws and regulations. The first video of this series is titled Oregon Governor Kate Brown, Fmr Campaign Manger Details "Graft & Corruption" https://youtu.be/uOJCUnq1Fg8 Tl;dr "This woman has been a corrupt governor since she became governor, replacing a previously corrupt governor who had to leave one month after his inauguration because of his corruption."
>>178360 https://youtu.be/cwV9n_c9eTo Supplemental video in which James O'Keefe confronts two individuals in the Phil Breseden staff who are featured in the previous video that focuses on Phil Breseden's campaign. Phil Bredesen who purports to be about law and order and the presumption of innocence (specifically pertaining to his public statements surrounding Kavanaugh) yet private and secret recordings of his staff paint a different picture, where his staffers are openly stating that the "Blue Wave" is being organized and directed behind closed doors, that Breseden would never support Kavanaugh in actuality, and how his staff in general have a very poor opinion of the constituency who they are trying to essentially trick into voting for him.
Phil Bredesen fires back at Project Veritas, contesting the legitimacy of their undercover video published yesterday. https://youtu.be/P-rLTPhAB5U "They were not working for the Bredesen for Senate campaign. They weren't passing along any sort of strategy information, they were literally just sitting around; its water-cooler talk." - Mark Brown, Tennessee Victory 2018 (Democrat group) "The individuals captured in our report work on Bredesen's campaign through the TN Democratic Party, and in fact were recorded in his campaign headquarters." - Project Veritas
Senator Claire McCaskill caught on tape (as well as staffers) concealing her leftist agenda of "Get elected, then ban guns and impeach", in the latest Project Veritas undercover video. https://youtu.be/Doh0d78lin4 "So here's the real question, Claire holds off on impeachment to get the moderates. What do we tell the moderates when we drop the impeachment hammer afterward?" -Reporter "Get over it." -Staffer
PVA follow-up, confronting Claire McCaskill Field Organizer Nicholas Starost on his statement that "Yeah. People just can't know that.", referring to his response to the question: "And they (Obama and McCaskill) have essentially the same views on everything?" https://youtu.be/uscXWUzVmvs
Nevermind, youtube is working again, probably unrelated to PVA. Having said, the top two videos released in the last two hours, follow up on the Claire McCaskill campaign. Her campaign claims to be moderate and bi-partisan, but there's a clear message from her campaign staffers and her voting record.
>>179137 >>179139 It wouldn't have surprised me if Veritas got Shoad, or that they really want to do it. It could be a "rouge" employer like before that tried to shoah them. But I think Project Veritas is actually in a good and safe place. They are sort of like wikileaks, but they find the truth themselves. If wikileaks or Project Veritas got blacklisted people would start to ask too many questions about why they got shoad. Youtube, FB or Twitter can't remove them without loosing all credibility for being neutral and/or for free speech. They would become instruments of the DNC for hiding the truth from people.
Project Veritas isn't done with Claire McCaskill, just now releasing a video focusing on her relationship with Planned Parenthood. Allegedly they use groups like Emily's List (?) and 'other means' to maintain support for the campaign without offending pro life and moderate voters, allowing the senator to maintain the position that she's a moderate democrat when in fact she is 100% in favor of abortion. https://youtu.be/iPFE9jTByBE
James O'Keefe discusses PVA at a 1st Amendment conference, answering questions from a NYT executive editor, a WaPo exec. editor, a Pittsburgh Post exec. editor, and the Google VP of news. Also promises another undercover vid tomorrow about an as-yet unnamed US senator. https://youtu.be/SUnoOr01n2M
>>183564 I have been reloading Veritas page many times over the days hoping for more drops. Wonder how this will go down. Can ICE request list of all that voted, and crosscheck it with their lists of dreamers and deport all names that match up?
Not nearly as salacious as others, PVA dropped another vid 2 hours ago, showing a (kinda weak desu, but still a) voting registrar advising undercover journalists on how to vote. Sort of. https://youtu.be/NfeDTRKbpPM >Georgia Electioneering: "Democrats has a better platform" Says Elections Off. in Undercover Video
Snap, another one was released for Ohio https://youtu.be/GAtwFEUD4no The general theme of these last few videos is not so much systemic corruption, but rather its individual. Its the person who is directly tasked by the state to operate impartially and without bias, in that they're directing and/or overseeing elections. And they all keep suggesting Democrat, without batting an eye. (which is illegal)
I wonder if this is a result of the exposing of the Deep State by Project Veritas >Federal Employees Are Warned Not to Discuss Trump ‘Resistance’ at Work >Generally, federal employees have been free to express opinions about policies and legislative activity at work as long as they do not advocate voting for or against particular candidates in partisan elections. But in a guidance document distributed on Wednesday, the independent agency that enforces the Hatch Act, a law that bars federal employees from taking part in partisan political campaigns at work or in an official capacity, warned that making or displaying statements at work about impeaching or resisting Mr. Trump is likely to amount to illegal political activity.